Skip to content
Sunday, October 18, 2026
CoreLines Tower

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine President Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Place in the Global Order

Following launching a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US military forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a team including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" entails is unclear, but the commitment marks an abrupt policy reversal for the president, rife with contradictions and formidable obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now staking his presidency on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He promised to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has reshaped Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is ready to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to previous operations, which have largely involved missiles and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are notably different.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra could be difficult for some of Trump's followers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is understandable because we are compelled to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, land and assets that are fundamental to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise larger questions in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a irresponsible attack on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be managing other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to inform congressional leaders prior to launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with no American deaths and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, successful and impressive displays of American power and proficiency in US history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

By

Jacqueline Elliott

Maya is a tech enthusiast and software developer with over a decade of experience in building scalable applications and sharing knowledge through blogging.

CoreLines Tower

Type to search articles.